4.3 Article

XGBoost-aided prediction of lip prominence based on hard-tissue measurements and demographic characteristics in an Asian population

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2023.01.017

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A machine learning-based study was conducted to predict lip prominence. The XGBoost model performed the best in predicting the distances between lips and the esthetics plane. The L1-NB distance contributed the most to lip prominence. The results can be used in orthodontic treatment planning.
Introduction: Prediction of lip prominence based on hard-tissue measurements could be helpful in orthodontic treatment planning and has been challenging and formidable thus far. Methods: A machine learning-based cross-sectional study was conducted on 1549 patients. Hard-tissue measurements and demographic information were used as the input features. Seven popular machine learning algorithms were applied to the datasets to predict upper and lower lip prominence. The algorithm that performed the best was selected for the construction of the prediction model. Evaluation of feature importance was conducted using 3 classical methods. Results: Among the 7 algorithms, the XGBoost model performed the best in the prediction of the distances between labrale superius or labrale inferius to the esthetics plane (UL-EP and LL-EP distances), with root mean square error values of 1.25, 1.49 and r2 values of 0.755 and 0.683, respectively. Among the 14 input features, the L1-NB distance contributed the most to the prominences of the upper and lower lips. A lip prominence predictor was developed to facilitate clinical application by deploying the prediction model into a downloadable tool kit. Conclusions: The XGBoost model performed well with high accuracy and practicability in predicting upper and lower lip prominence. The artificial intelligence-aided predictor could serve as a reference for orthodontic treatment planning. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2023;164:357-67)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据