4.5 Article

Validity Assessment of an Automated Brain Morphometry Tool for Patients with De Novo Memory Symptoms

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY
卷 44, 期 3, 页码 261-267

出版社

AMER SOC NEURORADIOLOGY
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A7790

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Auto volumetric analysis of brain MRI provides quantitative assessment of brain atrophy. In this study, the performance of AI-Rad Companion brain MRI software was compared to FreeSurfer pipeline. The results showed strong correlation, moderate consistency, and poor agreement in volume measurements between the two tools. The AI-Rad Companion tool had high specificity and sensitivity in detecting volumetric abnormalities compared to the FreeSurfer pipeline. There was no difference in the compatibility of radiologic and clinical impressions between the two tools.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Automated volumetric analysis of structural MR imaging allows quantitative assessment of brain atrophy in neurodegenerative disorders. We compared the brain segmentation performance of the AI-Rad Companion brain MR imaging software against an in-house FreeSurfer 7.1.1/Individual Longitudinal Participant pipeline. MATERIALS AND METHODS: T1-weighted images of 45 participants with de novo memory symptoms were selected from the OASIS-4 database and analyzed through the AI-Rad Companion brain MR imaging tool and the FreeSurfer 7.1.1/Individual Longitudinal Participant pipeline. Correlation, agreement, and consistency between the 2 tools were compared among the absolute, normalized, and standardized volumes. Final reports generated by each tool were used to compare the rates of detection of abnormality and the compatibility of radiologic impressions made using each tool, compared with the clinical diagnoses. RESULTS: We observed strong correlation, moderate consistency, and poor agreement between absolute volumes of the main cortical lobes and subcortical structures measured by the AI-Rad Companion brain MR imaging tool compared with FreeSurfer. The strength of the correlations increased after normalizing the measurements to the total intracranial volume. Standardized measurements differed significantly between the 2 tools, likely owing to differences in the normative data sets used to calibrate each tool. When considering the FreeSurfer 7.1.1/Individual Longitudinal Participant pipeline as a reference standard, the AI-Rad Companion brain MR imaging tool had a specificity of 90.6%-100% and a sensitivity of 64.3%-100% in detecting volumetric abnormalities. There was no difference between the rate of compatibility of radiologic and clinical impressions when using the 2 tools. CONCLUSIONS: The AI-Rad Companion brain MR imaging tool reliably detects atrophy in cortical and subcortical regions implicated in the differential diagnosis of dementia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据