4.5 Article

Crowd-Sourced Deep Learning for Intracranial Hemorrhage Identification: Wisdom of Crowds or Laissez-Faire

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY
卷 44, 期 7, 页码 762-767

出版社

AMER SOC NEURORADIOLOGY
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A7902

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Researchers tested ensemble learning for selecting the best artificial intelligence models for intracranial hemorrhage detection, but ensemble learning methods did not outperform the single best model.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Researchers and clinical radiology practices are increasingly faced with the task of selecting the most accurate artificial intelligence tools from an ever-expanding range. In this study, we sought to test the utility of ensemble learning for determining the best combination from 70 models trained to identify intracranial hemorrhage. Furthermore, we investigated whether ensemble deployment is preferred to use of the single best model. It was hypothesized that any individual model in the ensemble would be outperformed by the ensemble.MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, de-identified clinical head CT scans from 134 patients were included. Every section was annotated with ?no-intracranial hemorrhage? or ?intracranial hemorrhage,? and 70 convolutional neural networks were used for their identification. Four ensemble learning methods were researched, and their accuracies as well as receiver operating characteristic curves and the corresponding areas under the curve were compared with those of individual convolutional neural networks. The areas under the curve were compared for a statistical difference using a generalized U-statistic.RESULTS: The individual convolutional neural networks had an average test accuracy of 67.8% (range, 59.4%?76.0%). Three ensemble learning methods outperformed this average test accuracy, but only one achieved an accuracy above the 95th percentile of the individual convolutional neural network accuracy distribution. Only 1 ensemble learning method achieved a similar area under the curve as the single best convolutional neural network (?area under the curve = 0.03; 95% CI, ?0.01?0.06; P = .17).CONCLUSIONS: None of the ensemble learning methods outperformed the accuracy of the single best convolutional neural network, at least in the context of intracranial hemorrhage detection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据