4.2 Article

Exome-wide assessment of isolated biliary atresia: A report from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study using child-parent trios and a case-control design to identify novel rare variants

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A
卷 191, 期 6, 页码 1546-1556

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.63185

关键词

biliary atresia; birth defect; NBDPS; rare variants; whole exome sequencing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The etiology of biliary atresia (BA) is complex and still unknown, with recent studies suggesting a potential role for rare protein-altering variants (PAVs). Exome sequencing analysis on child-parent trios, child-mother duo, and parents of children with other birth defects revealed that most cases of BA are isolated. The study did not find strong evidence for recurrent de novo PAVs in BA susceptibility, but highlighted the difficulty in diagnosing BA due to the involvement of genes associated with other syndromes.
The etiology of biliary atresia (BA) is unknown, but recent studies suggest a role for rare protein-altering variants (PAVs). Exome sequencing data from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study on 54 child-parent trios, one child-mother duo, and 1513 parents of children with other birth defects were analyzed. Most (91%) cases were isolated BA. We performed (1) a trio-based analysis to identify rare de novo, homozygous, and compound heterozygous PAVs and (2) a case-control analysis using a sequence kernel-based association test to identify genes enriched with rare PAVs. While we replicated previous findings on PKD1L1, our results do not suggest that recurrent de novo PAVs play important roles in BA susceptibility. In fact, our finding in NOTCH2, a disease gene associated with Alagille syndrome, highlights the difficulty in BA diagnosis. Notably, IFRD2 has been implicated in other gastrointestinal conditions and warrants additional study. Overall, our findings strengthen the hypothesis that the etiology of BA is complex.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据