4.2 Review

ARID2, a rare cause of Coffin-Siris syndrome: A novel microdeletion at 12q12q13.11 causing severe short stature and literature review

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A
卷 191, 期 5, 页码 1240-1249

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.63139

关键词

ARID2 deficiency; coffin-Siris syndrome 6; genotype-phenotype correlation; phenotypic spectrum; severe short stature

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a 5-year-7-month-old Chinese female with Coffin-Siris syndrome (CSS) 6 was found to have a de novo 1.563 Mb heterozygous copy number loss at 12q12q13.11, leading to the entire deletion of ARID2. The patient exhibited severe short stature, dysmorphic facial features, global developmental delay, and hypoplastic fingers and toes. The correlation between age and height standard deviation score (SDS) suggests a possibility of growth catch-up.
Coffin-Siris syndrome (CSS) 6 is caused by heterozygous pathogenic variants in the AT-rich interaction domain 2 (ARID2) gene on 12q12. Currently, only 26 cases with both detailed clinical and genetic information have been documented in the literature. Microdeletions of the entire ARID2 gene are rare. In this study, we report a 5-year-7-month-old Chinese female who underwent whole-exome sequencing to discover that she had a de novo 1.563 Mb heterozygous copy number loss at 12q12q13.11, involving an entire deletion of ARID2. The female had severe short stature with obvious dysmorphic facial features, global developmental delay and hypoplastic fingers and toes. Her growth hormone level was normal, with reduced IGF-1 and increased CA19-9 levels. After a review of the 27 patients with ARID2 deficiency, a significant positive correlation was observed between age and height standard deviation score (SDS) (r = 0.71, p = 0.0002), suggesting a possibility of growth catch-up. This study expands the genetic and phenotypic spectrum of CCS6 and provides a decision-making reference for growth hormone therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据