4.6 Article

MEK1 dependent and independent ERK activation regulates IL-10 and IL-12 production in bone marrow derived macrophages

期刊

CELLULAR SIGNALLING
卷 27, 期 10, 页码 2068-2076

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2015.07.015

关键词

Macrophages; ERK; MEK1; MEK2; STAT/JAK; IL-12; IL-10

资金

  1. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) [R01HL113508]
  2. Department of Medicine and the Center for Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Wayne State University School of Medicine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mitogen activated protein kinases ERK1/2 play an important role in response to toll like receptor (TLR) activation and cytokine production, including IL-10 and IL-12. Here, we examined the role of MEK1 in ERK1/2 activation in response to TLR4 agonist by using bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) from wild type (WT) and Mek1(d/d)Sox2(cre) mice. Our data demonstrates that MEK1 is essential for ERK1/2 activation in response to LPS. Furthermore, stimulation of the TLR4 receptor of BMDMs derived from Mek1(d/d)su2(cre) mice showed enhanced STAT4 phosphorylation and increased IL-12 secretion, but exhibited a significantly lower IL-10 production as compared to WT macrophages. Most interestingly, TLR ligation in the presence of recombinant IL-10 (rIL-10) or retinoic acid (RA) led to ERK1/2 activation independent of MEK1 in BMDMs derived from mek1(d/d)sox2(cre) mice and led to inhibition of STAT4 and decreased IL-12 levels. Collectively, these data suggest that MEK1 is required for TLR4 mediated ERK activation and in turn regulates the production of IL-10 and IL-12. It also indicates that ERK1/2 can be activated independent of MEK1 in the presence of IL-10 and RA and this activation negatively regulates IL-12, but positively regulates IL-10 production. These findings may have significant implications for the development of drugs that modulate MEK1 activity in the treatment of inflammatory, autoimmune and proliferative diseases such as cancer. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据