4.7 Review

Preclinical and translational models for delirium: Recommendations for future research from the NIDUS delirium network

期刊

ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/alz.12941

关键词

animal models; biomarkers; delirium

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Delirium is a common, morbid, and costly syndrome closely associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and AD-related dementias (ADRD). While human studies have improved our understanding of delirium in terms of incidence, risk factors, outcomes, and management, limited knowledge exists about the neurobiology of delirium. This article discusses the use of preclinical and translational animal models to advance our understanding of delirium neurobiology and develop new prevention and treatment strategies. Recommendations for the development and validation of these models are provided to enhance awareness in this important field.
Delirium is a common, morbid, and costly syndrome that is closely linked to Alzheimer's disease (AD) and AD-related dementias (ADRD) as a risk factor and outcome. Human studies of delirium have advanced our knowledge of delirium incidence and prevalence, risk factors, biomarkers, outcomes, prevention, and management. However, understanding of delirium neurobiology remains limited. Preclinical and translational models for delirium, while challenging to develop, could advance our knowledge of delirium neurobiology and inform the development of new prevention and treatment approaches. We discuss the use of preclinical and translational animal models in delirium, focusing on (1) a review of current animal models, (2) challenges and strategies for replicating elements of human delirium in animals, and (3) the utility of biofluid, neurophysiology, and neuroimaging translational markers in animals. We conclude with recommendations for the development and validation of preclinical and translational models for delirium, with the goal of advancing awareness in this important field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据