4.7 Article

What would a population-level approach to dementia risk reduction look like, and how would it work?

期刊

ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA
卷 19, 期 7, 页码 3203-3209

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/alz.12985

关键词

dementia; public health; risk reduction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dementia is a global public health challenge, and individual-level prevention strategies have limited potential. A population-level approach is needed to reduce the incidence of dementia and address global inequalities in risk. This approach can be highly cost-effective.
Dementia is a leading global public health challenge. Prevention approaches have traditionally focused on individual-level strategies. However, such approaches have limited potential, particularly for resource-constrained populations in which exposure to risk factors is greatest, and exposure to protective factors is lowest. A population-level approach to dementia risk reduction is therefore essential to meet the scale of the challenge and to tackle global inequalities in risk and incidence of disease. Such approaches can be highly cost effective. In this viewpoint article, we describe what such an approach should look like, barriers and facilitators to success, and how we should go about achieving it. We include 10 strategic goals to achieve population-level dementia risk reduction and protection enhancement, targeted at researchers, professionals, funders, science communicators, governments, businesses, and policy makers. If we are to significantly reduce the prevalence of dementia there must be increased emphasis on population-level approaches. HighlightsDementia risk reduction is a global public health priorityPopulation-level approaches change societal conditions to make them less conducive to dementia's modifiable risk factors, and increase exposure to protective factors.Urgent development of population-level approaches is required to reduce the prevalence of, and inequalities in, dementiaAction is required from researchers, governments and business, funders, public health professionals, and science communicators.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据