Antibiotic responsibility and agricultural publics: diverse stakeholder perceptions of antibiotic use in animal agriculture

This paper examines diverse perspectives around the concept of responsibility concerning antibiotic use in animal agriculture. Antibiotic use in agriculture has been identified as a source of antimicrobial resistance, one of the largest public health threats today. In the United States, efforts to curb antibiotic use in farming draws on a diverse range of actors-including farmers, veterinarians, consumers, and public health advocates-and relies on a mix of industry standards and federal guidelines around responsible use. The paper selects a similarly diverse range of people and employs Q methodology to query the points of disagreement and consensus around the practices that constitute responsible antibiotic use in animal agriculture, and who is responsible for antimicrobial resistance. We find a diverse mix of actor types across three discourses, but with clear differences between farmers and public health advocates. We also argue that, in some cases, points of disagreement and agreement are often based on different interpretations of ideas, indicating points of common ground where there might appear to be disagreement, and areas of difference where there appears to be agreement. We argue that these flexible interpretations of some of the key issues around antibiotic use are nevertheless grounded in durable differences in views of what agriculture is and what it should be.

Automated summary

This paper examines diverse perspectives on the responsibility for antibiotic use in animal agriculture, which is identified as a significant source of antimicrobial resistance. The study analyzes the points of disagreement and agreement among different stakeholders, such as farmers and public health advocates, using Q methodology. The findings reveal differences in views and interpretations, highlighting areas of common ground and difference. It concludes that these variations are rooted in enduring disparities in perceptions of agriculture.