4.8 Article

Single-Site Cobalt Catalysts at New Zr8(μ2-O)8(μ2-OH)4 Metal-Organic Framework Nodes for Highly Active Hydrogenation of Alkenes, (mines, Carbonyls, and Heterocycles

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 138, 期 37, 页码 12234-12242

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b06759

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF [CHE-1464941]
  2. Divisions of Chemistry (CHE) and Materials Research (DMR), NSF [NSF/CHE-1346572]
  3. U.S. DOE Office of Science
  4. U.S. DOE [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  6. Division Of Chemistry [1346572] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report here the synthesis of robust and porous metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), M-MTBC (M = Zr or Hf), constructed from the tetrahedral linker methane-tetrakis(p-biphenylcarboxylate) (MTBC) and two types of secondary building units (SBUs): cubic M-8(mu(2)-O)(8)(mu(2)-OH)(4) and octahedral M-6(mu(3)-O)(4)(mu(3)-OH)(4). While the M-6-SBU is isostructural with the 12-connected octahedral SBUs of UiO-type MOFs, the M-8-SBU is composed of eight M-IV ions in a cubic fashion linked by eight mu(2)-oxo and four mu(2)-OH groups. The metalation of Zr-MTBC SBUs with CoCl2, followed by treatment with NaBEt3H, afforded highly active and reusable solid Zr-MTBC-CoH catalysts for the hydrogenation of alkenes, imines, carbonyls, and heterocycles. Zr-MTBC-CoH was impressively tolerant of a range of functional groups and displayed high activity in the hydrogenation of tri- and tetra-substituted alkenes with TON > 8000 for the hydrogenation of 2,3-dimethyl-2-butene. Our structural and spectroscopic studies show that site isolation of and open environments around the cobalt-hydride catalytic species at Zr-8-SBUs are responsible for high catalytic activity in the hydrogenation of a wide range of challenging substrates. MOFs thus provide a novel platform for discovering and studying new single-site base-metal solid catalysts with enromous potential for sustainable chemical synthesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据