4.7 Article

Space-time upscaling of reactive transport in porous media

期刊

ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES
卷 176, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2023.104443

关键词

Space-time upscaling; Global random walk; Reactive transport; Richards equation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reactive transport in porous media can be upscaled to a larger scale by using coarse-grained space-time (CGST) averages. This approach allows us to model the flow velocity and diffusion coefficient in terms of averaged microscopic quantities, which are verified using global random walk (GRW) simulations. The upscaled approach is applied to biodegradation processes in aquifers and soils, showing significant differences with classical volume averages in time-dependent processes.
Reactive transport in saturated/unsaturated porous media is numerically upscaled to the space-time scale of a hypothetical measurement through coarse-grained space-time (CGST) averages. The reactive transport is modeled at the fine-grained Darcy scale by the actual number of molecules involved in reactions which undergo advective and diffusive movements described by global random walk (GRW) simulations. The CGST averages verify identities similar to a local balance equation which allow us to derive expressions for the flow velocity and the intrinsic diffusion coefficient in terms of averaged microscopic quantities. The latter are further used to verify the CGST-GRW numerical approach. The upscaling approach is applied to biodegradation processes in saturated aquifers and variably saturated soils and the CGST averages are compared to classical volume averages. One finds that if the process is characterized by slow variations in time, as in homogeneous reaction systems, the differences between the two averages are negligible. Instead, the differences are significant and can be extremely large in simulations of time-dependent biodegradation processes in both variably saturated soils and saturated aquifers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据