4.8 Article

A Nitroxide Radical Conjugated Polymer as an Additive to Reduce Nonradiative Energy Loss in Organic Solar Cells

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS
卷 35, 期 23, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.202212084

关键词

low-lying triplets; nitroxide radical conjugated polymers; nonradiative energy loss; organic solar cells; solid additives

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new approach using a conjugated nitroxide radical polymer (GDTA) as an additive has been shown to improve the photovoltaic performance of nonfullerene-acceptor-based organic solar cells (NFA-OSCs) by enhancing the open-circuit voltage, fill factor, and short-circuit current density.
Nonfullerene-acceptor-based organic solar cells (NFA-OSCs) are now set off to the 20% power conversion efficiency milestone. To achieve this, minimizing all loss channels, including nonradiative photovoltage losses, seems a necessity. Nonradiative recombination, to a great extent, is known to be an inherent material property due to vibrationally induced decay of charge-transfer (CT) states or their back electron transfer to the triplet excitons. Herein, it is shown that the use of a new conjugated nitroxide radical polymer with 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl piperidine-1-oxyl side groups (GDTA) as an additive results in an improvement of the photovoltaic performance of NFA-OSCs based on different active layer materials. Upon the addition of GDTA, the open-circuit voltage (V-OC), fill factor (FF), and short-circuit current density (J(SC)) improve simultaneously. This approach is applied to several material systems including state-of-the-art donor/acceptor pairs showing improvement from 15.8% to 17.6% (in the case of PM6:Y6) and from 17.5% to 18.3% (for PM6:BTP-eC9). Then, the possible reasons behind the observed improvements are discussed. The results point toward the suppression of the CT state to triplet excitons loss channel. This work presents a facile, promising, and generic approach to further improve the performance of NFA-OSCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据