4.8 Article

As-Grown Miniaturized True Zero-Order Waveplates Based on Low-Dimensional Ferrocene Crystals

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.202302468

关键词

anisotropy; birefringence; ferrocenes; self-assembly; true zero-order waveplates

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a bottom-up method is used to grow ferrocene crystals to demonstrate self-assembled ultrathin true zero-order waveplates without additional machining processing, which is particularly suited for nanophotonic integration. The grown waveplate has high birefringence, low dichroism, and a potentially broad operating range. The as-grown waveplate allows the development of further miniaturized systems via tandem integration.
As basic optical elements, waveplates with anisotropic electromagnetic responses are imperative for manipulating light polarization. Conventional waveplates are manufactured from bulk crystals (e.g., quartz and calcite) through a series of precision cutting and grinding steps, which typically result in large size, low yield, and high cost. In this study, a bottom-up method is used to grow ferrocene crystals with large anisotropy to demonstrate self-assembled ultrathin true zero-order waveplates without additional machining processing, which is particularly suited for nanophotonic integration. The van der Waals ferrocene crystals exhibit high birefringence (& UDelta;n (experiment) = 0.149 & PLUSMN; 0.002 at 636 nm), low dichroism & UDelta;& kappa; (experiment) = -0.0007 at 636 nm), and a potentially broad operating range (550 nm to 20 & mu;m) as suggested by Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations. In addition, the grown waveplate's highest and the lowest principal axes (n(1) and n(3), respectively) are in the a-c plane, where the fast axis is along one natural edge of the ferrocene crystal, rendering them readily usable. The as-grown, wavelength-scale-thick waveplate allows the development of further miniaturized systems via tandem integration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据