4.8 Article

Supporting Trimetallic Metal-Organic Frameworks on S/N-Doped Carbon Macroporous Fibers for Highly Efficient Electrocatalytic Oxygen Evolution

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.202207888

关键词

cation-exchange; hollow S; N-doped carbon; metal-organic frameworks; oxygen evolution reaction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a promising oxygen evolution reaction (OER) electrocatalyst, S/N-CMF@FexCoyNi1-x-y-MOF, was delicately fabricated via a cation-exchange strategy, which exhibited outstanding activity and stability in alkaline OER. The outstanding performance of the electrocatalyst was attributed to the trimetallic composition, hollow S/N-CMF matrix facilitating exposure of active sites, and the post-formed Fe/Co-doped gamma-NiOOH during the OER operation.
Hybrid materials, integrating the merits of individual components, are ideal structures for efficient oxygen evolution reaction (OER). However, the rational construction of hybrid structures with decent physical/electrochemical properties is yet challenging. Herein, a promising OER electrocatalyst composed of trimetallic metal-organic frameworks supported over S/N-doped carbon macroporous fibers (S/N-CMF@FexCoyNi1-x-y-MOF) via a cation-exchange strategy is delicately fabricated. Benefiting from the trimetallic composition with improved intrinsic activity, hollow S/N-CMF matrix facilitating exposure of active sites, as well as their robust integration, the resultant S/N-CMF@FexCoyNi1-x-y-MOF electrocatalyst delivers outstanding activity and stability for alkaline OER. Specifically, it needs an overpotential of 296 mV to reach the benchmark current density of 10 mA cm(-2) with a small Tafel slope of 53.5 mV dec(-1). In combination with X-ray absorption fine structure spectroscopy and density functional theory calculations, the post-formed Fe/Co-doped gamma-NiOOH during the OER operation is revealed to account for the high OER performance of S/N-CMF@FexCoyNi1-x-y-MOF.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据