4.8 Article

Unusual Temperature Dependence of Water Sorption in Semicrystalline Hydrogels

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS
卷 35, 期 22, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.202211763

关键词

hydrogels; phase transformation; temperature dependence; vapor sorption; water harvesting

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Water vapor sorption plays a crucial role in various applications, but conventional materials tend to capture less water vapor at higher temperatures. However, a recent study reports an inverse temperature dependence of water sorption in poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) hydrogels, where the water uptake can be doubled with increasing temperature from 25 to 50 degrees C. This unusual phenomenon is attributed to the first-order phase transformation of PEG structures, providing insights for developing new materials for moisture and heat harnessing.
Water vapor sorption is a ubiquitous phenomenon in nature and plays an important role in various applications, including humidity regulation, energy storage, thermal management, and water harvesting. In particular, capturing moisture at elevated temperatures is highly desirable to prevent dehydration and to enlarge the tunability of water uptake. However, owing to the thermodynamic limit of conventional materials, sorbents inevitably tend to capture less water vapor at higher temperatures, impeding their broad applications. Here, an inverse temperature dependence of water sorption in poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) hydrogels, where their water uptake can be doubled with increasing temperature from 25 to 50 degrees C, is reported. With mechanistic modeling of water-polymer interactions, this unusual water sorption is attributed to the first-order phase transformation of PEG structures, and the key parameters for a more generalized strategy in materials development are identified. This work elucidates a new regime of water sorption with an unusual temperature dependence, enabling a promising engineering space for harnessing moisture and heat.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据