4.8 Article

Reconstructing Oxygen-Deficient Zirconia with Ruthenium Catalyst on Atomic-Scale Interfaces toward Hydrogen Production

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 33, 期 29, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202300673

关键词

hydrogen evolution reaction; metal-organic frameworks; metal-support interactions; oxygen-deficient zirconia; reconstruction engineering; Ru catalysts; single-atom sites catalysts

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Downsizing a catalyst nanoparticle to a single atom has been successful in increasing its catalytic activity and reducing the amount of catalyst needed for electrochemical reactions. However, the stability of single-atom site catalysts remains a challenge. This study proposes using stable metal oxide nanoparticles as supports to enhance the electrochemical activity and stability of single-atom catalysts for the hydrogen evolution reaction.
Downsizing a catalyst nanoparticle (NP) to a single atom (SA) has proven to be highly effective in increasing catalytic activity and decreasing the amount of catalyst required for various electrochemical reactions. However, insufficient stability of the single-atom site catalysts (SACs) is still a significant challenge for their practical application. Here, SACs firmly bound to stable metal oxide NPs are proposed to dramatically increase the electrochemical activity and stability of SA-based catalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). Starting from a Ru-infiltrated, Zr-based metal-organic framework (MOF), the tetragonal zirconium oxide (ZrO2-x) NPs-embedded carbon matrix is fabricated as support through facile pyrolysis. Simultaneously, Ru SAs as active sites are well dispersed on the surface of ZrO2-x NPs due to the generation of oxygen vacancies in the tetragonal ZrO2-x. The Ru-ZrO2-x SAC exhibits a 4-5 times higher mass activity than commercial Pt and Ru catalysts and superior durability due to strong metal-support interaction (SMSI) between Ru atoms and ZrO2-x substrate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据