4.8 Article

Metal-Coordinated Adsorption of Nanoparticles to Macrophages for Targeted Cancer Therapy

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202214842

关键词

doxorubicin; living cell-based drug delivery systems; macrophages; metal ion-phenolic networks; photothermal therapies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A method is established to externally adsorb nanocarriers onto living cells, reducing cytotoxicity and enabling improved drug release. By attaching multi-functional metal ion-phenolic networks onto macrophage surfaces, bioactivity of carrier cells is maintained, and chemotherapy is improved. This facile and efficient method provides a platform technology for the development of living cell-based drug delivery systems.
Living cell-based drug delivery systems (LC-DDSs) are limited by adverse interactions between drugs and carrier cells, typically drug-induced toxicity to carrier cells and restriction of carrier cells on drug release. Here, a method is established to adsorb nanocarriers externally to living cells, thereby reducing cytotoxicity caused by drug uptake and realizing improved drug release at the disease site. It is found that a divalent metal ion-phenolic network (MPN) affords adhesion of poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles onto macrophage (M phi) surfaces with minimized intracellular uptake and no negative effect on cell proliferation. On this basis, an M phi-DDS with doxorubicin-loaded nanoparticles on cell surface (DOX-NP@M phi) is constructed. Compared to intracellular loading via endocytosis, this method well-maintains bioactivity (viability and migration chemotaxis) of the carrier cell. By virtue of the photothermal effect of MPN at the tumor site, DOX-NP-associated vesicles are liberated for improved chemotherapy. This facile, benign, and efficient method (ice bath, 2 min) for extracellular nanoparticle attachment and minimizing intracellular uptake provides a platform technology for LC-DDS development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据