4.8 Article

Mixed Ruddlesden-Popper and Dion-Jacobson Phase Perovskites for Stable and Efficient Blue Perovskite LEDs

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202303301

关键词

deep blue; Dion-Jacobson; low-dimensional perovskite LEDs; spectral stability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Producing efficient blue and deep blue perovskite LEDs (PeLEDs) is still a challenge in optoelectronics due to problems with color, luminance, and stability. This study proposes a solution by mixing DJ phase precursors into RP phase perovskites, which suppresses unwanted phases and allows for blue shifting. By optimizing the concentration and layers, a stable deep blue PeLED with an external quantum efficiency of 1.5% at 469 nm is achieved.
Producing efficient blue and deep blue perovskite LEDs (PeLEDs) still represents a significant challenge in optoelectronics. Blue PeLEDs still have problems relating to color, luminance, and structural and electrical stability so new materials are needed to achieve better performance. Recent reports suggest using low n states (n = 1, 2, 3) to achieve blue electroluminescence in Ruddlesden-Popper (RP) perovskite films. However, there are fewer reports on the other quasi-2D structure, Dion-Jacobson (DJ) perovksites, despite their highly desirable optical properties, due to the difficulty in achieving charge injection. To resolve this issue, herein, w e have mixed DJ phase precursors, propane-1,3-diammonium (PDA) bromide into RP phase perovskites and fabricated low-dimensional PeLEDs. It is found that these specific precursors aid in suppressing both the low n (n = 1) and high n (n >= 4) quasi-2D RP phases and is an effective strategy in blue-shifting sky-blue RP perovskites into the sub-470 nm region. With optimization of the PDA concentration and device layers, it is achieved an external quantum efficiency of 1.5% at 469 nm and stable electroluminescence for the first deep blue PeLED to be reported using DJ perovskites.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据