4.6 Article

3D Investigation of Damage During Strain-Controlled Thermomechanical Fatigue of Cast Al-Si Alloys

期刊

ADVANCED ENGINEERING MATERIALS
卷 25, 期 17, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adem.202300339

关键词

cast Al-Si alloys; neutron diffraction; synchrotron tomography; thermomechanical fatigue; 3D microstructure characterizations

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the strain-controlled thermomechanical fatigue behavior of three cast near-eutectic Al-Si alloys with different Ni, Cu, and Mg contents. Synchrotron tomography and neutron diffraction experiments are used to correlate 3D microstructural features with damage initiation and evolution. The results show that the alloy with lower Cu, Ni, and Mg concentrations has higher thermomechanical fatigue resistance and slower damage accumulation compared to other alloys, resulting from its higher ductility and the absence of large primary Si clusters which act as preferred crack initiation sites during the early stages of thermomechanical fatigue.
The strain-controlled thermomechanical fatigue behavior is investigated for three cast near-eutectic Al-Si alloys with different Ni, Cu, and Mg contents. Synchrotron tomography and neutron diffraction experiments are used to correlate 3D microstructural features with damage initiation and evolution. The results show that the alloy with lower Cu, Ni, and Mg concentrations has up to 45% higher thermomechanical fatigue resistance for cooling/heating rates of 5 and 15 K s(-1). In addition, this alloy also exhibits damage formation at later stages during thermomechanical fatigue and slower damage accumulation compared to other alloys. This difference in behavior is a consequence of its higher ductility, which is a result of the lower volume fraction and global interconnectivity of the 3D hybrid networks formed by Si and intermetallics and the absence of large primary Si clusters which act as preferred crack initiation sites during the early stages of thermomechanical fatigue.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据