4.5 Article

Infectivity of three Mayaro Virus geographic isolates in human cell lines

期刊

ACTA TROPICA
卷 242, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2023.106894

关键词

Arbovirus; Geographic variation; Interferon; Envelope; Cytopathogenicity; Structure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mayaro virus (MAYV) is an emergent arthropod-borne virus causing acute febrile illness with arthralgia, similar to chikungunya virus. Regional differences in MAYV do not affect replication kinetics, but MAYV-U causes the most cytopathic effect in a time-dependent manner. Mutations in the E2 protein of MAYV-U could interact with the host cell receptor and affect infectivity.
Mayaro virus (MAYV) is an emergent arthropod-borne virus that causes an acute febrile illness accompanied by arthralgia, similar to chikungunya virus. Increasing urbanization of MAYV outbreaks in the Americas has led to concerns for geographic expansion and spillover. Given the potential importance of this pathogen, we sought to fill critical gaps in knowledge regarding MAYV infectivity and geographic variation. This study describes the cytopathogenicity of MAYV in human dermal fibroblasts, human skeletal muscle satellite cells, human embryonic kidney cells (HEK), peripherally derived human macrophages, and Vero cells. We found that regional differences between these viruses do not affect replication kinetics, with high titers peaking at 37 h post infection. MAYV-U, did however, cause the most cytopathic effect in a time-dependent manner. Compared to the other two proto-typic isolates, MAYV-U harbors unique mutations in the E2 protein, D60G and S205F, that are likely to interact with the host cell receptor and could affect infectivity. We further demonstrate that pre-treatment of cells with interferon-beta inhibited viral replication in a dose-dependent manner. Together, these findings advance our un-derstanding of MAYV infection of human target cells and provide initial data regarding variation according to geography.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据