4.6 Article

Mutations in ARHGEF15 cause autosomal dominant hereditary cerebral small vessel disease and osteoporotic fracture

期刊

ACTA NEUROPATHOLOGICA
卷 145, 期 5, 页码 681-705

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00401-023-02560-6

关键词

ARHGEF15; Cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD); Osteoporotic fracture; RhoA; ROCK2; Wnt; beta-catenin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research report identifies that mutations in the ARHGEF15 gene are a cause of cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD), and individuals with these mutations also exhibit osteoporosis and fractures.
Cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) is a prominent cause of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke and a leading cause of vascular dementia, affecting small penetrating vessels of the brain. Despite current advances in genetic susceptibility studies, challenges remain in defining the causative genes and the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. Here, we reported that the ARHGEF15 gene was a causal gene linked to autosomal dominant inherited CSVD. We identified one heterozygous nonsynonymous mutation of the ARHGEF15 gene that cosegregated completely in two families with CSVD, and a heterozygous nonsynonymous mutation and a stop-gain mutation in two individuals with sporadic CSVD, respectively. Intriguingly, clinical imaging and pathological findings displayed severe osteoporosis and even osteoporotic fractures in all the ARHGEF15 mutation carriers. In vitro experiments indicated that ARHGEF15 mutations resulted in RhoA/ROCK2 inactivation-induced F-actin cytoskeleton disorganization in vascular smooth muscle cells and endothelial cells and osteoblast dysfunction by inhibiting the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway in osteoblast cells. Furthermore, Arhgef15-e(V368M)1 transgenic mice developed CSVD-like pathological and behavioral phenotypes, accompanied by severe osteoporosis. Taken together, our findings provide strong evidence that loss-of-function mutations of the ARHGEF15 gene cause CSVD accompanied by osteoporotic fracture.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据