4.2 Article

Validity, reliability and minimal detectable change of Mini-BESTest Turkish version in neurological disorders

期刊

ACTA NEUROLOGICA BELGICA
卷 123, 期 4, 页码 1519-1525

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13760-023-02299-7

关键词

Mini-BESTest; Balance; Validity; Turkish; Neurological

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of Mini-BESTestTR in Turkish patients with neurological disorders. Results showed that Mini-BESTestTR had excellent inter-rater reliability and test-retest reliability, as well as significant correlations with other balance assessment measures.
AimsIt is aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of Mini-BESTestTR in Turkish patients with neurological disorders.MethodsA total of 61 people between the ages of 42 and 80, who were patients with Parkinson's disease, stroke or multiple sclerosis for more than 1 year, were included in the study. For inter-rater reliability, two independent researchers applied the scale two times within 5 days for test-retest reliability. The relationship of mini-BESTestTR with Berg Balance Scale (BBS) to assess concurrent validity, and Timed Get up and Go (TUG), Functional Reach Test (FRT) and Functional Ambulation Classification (FAC) for convergent validity was investigated.ResultsThe scores of the two evaluators were within the range of agreement (mean = - 0.278 +/- 1.484, p > 0.05), and the Mini-BESTestTR had excellent inter-rater reliability [ICC (95% CI) = 0.989 (0.981-0.993)] and test-retest reliability [ICC (95% CI) = 0.998 (0.996-0.999)]. Mini-BESTestTR had a strong correlation with BBS (r = 0.853, p < 0.001) and TUG (r = - 0.856, p < 0.001), had a moderate correlation with FAC (r = 0.696, p < 0.001) and FRT (r = 0.650, p < 0.001).ConclusionsMini-BESTestTR showed significant correlations with other balance assessment measures, and concurrent and convergent validity of Mini-BESTestTR was demonstrated when administered to a sample of patients with chronic stroke, Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据