4.5 Article

Geochronology, Mineralogy, and Geochemistry of the Tonsteins from the Permo-Carboniferous Benxi Formation, Ordos Basin, North China Craton

期刊

ACTA GEOLOGICA SINICA-ENGLISH EDITION
卷 97, 期 5, 页码 1355-1371

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1755-6724.15063

关键词

tonsteins; geochemistry; Permo-Carboniferous; North China Craton

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the geochronology, mineralogy, and geochemistry of four tonstein samples from the Permo-Carboniferous Benxi Formation, Ordos Basin, North China Craton. The results show that these tonsteins have features of pyroclastic and felsic magma origin, providing precise chronological information and affecting the distribution of elements in coal seams.
Tonstein layers are found worldwide in the Permo-Carboniferous coal-bearing strata. This study investigates the geochronology, mineralogy, and geochemistry of four tonstein samples from the Permo-Carboniferous Benxi Formation, Ordos Basin, North China Craton (NCC). The typical features of the studied tonsteins include thin beds, lateral continuity, angular quartz grains, and euhedral zircons with similar U-Pb ages, indicating a significant pyroclastic origin. In addition, the tonstein samples have low TiO2/Al2O3 ratios (<0.02) and rare earth elements and yttrium (REY) concentrations with obvious negative Eu anomalies, indicating that the tonsteins have a felsic magma origin. Moreover, compared with the mean composition of clay shale, the studied tonsteins are characterized by high concentrations of the elements Nb and Ta, which may affect the concentration of the corresponding elements in surrounding coal seams. The zircon U-Pb ages of the tonsteins (293.9-298.8 Ma) provide a precise chronological framework on the Benxi Formation in the Ordos Basin, constraining the Gzhelian-Aselian stages. The tonsteins were probably sourced from arc volcanism along the western margin of the NCC during the early Permian, implying that the Alxa Terrane had not amalgamated with the NCC at that time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据