4.8 Article

Spectral computed tomography-guided radiotherapy of osteosarcoma utilizing BiOI nanosheets

期刊

ACTA BIOMATERIALIA
卷 166, 期 -, 页码 615-626

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2023.05.026

关键词

Dual-energy computed tomography; Contrast agents; Osteosarcoma; Radiosensitizers

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Osteosarcoma is an aggressive bone tumor commonly found in children and adolescents. Dual-energy CT (DECT) is a promising tool for accurately detecting and guiding the treatment of osteosarcoma. In this study, BiOI nanosheets were synthesized as a superior DECT contrast agent compared to iodine agents for clinical detection of osteosarcoma. In addition, the synthesized BiOI nanosheets demonstrated good biocompatibility and enhanced X-ray dose deposition at the tumor site, leading to DNA damage and inhibition of tumor growth. This research offers a promising new avenue for DECT imaging-guided treatment of osteosarcoma.
As an aggressive malignant bone tumor, osteosarcoma (OS) is usually found in children and adolescents. Computed tomography (CT) is an important tool for the clinical evaluation of osteosarcoma, but limits to low diagnostic specificity due to single parameters of traditional CT and modest signal-to-noise ratio of clinical iodinated contrast agents. As one kind of spectral CT, dual-energy CT (DECT), with the advantage of a provision of multi-parameter information, makes it possible to acquire the best signal-to-noise ratio image, accurate detection, as well as imaging-guided therapy of bone tumors. Hereby, we synthesized BiOI nanosheets (BiOI NSs) as a DECT contrast agent with superior imaging capability compared to iodine agents for clinical detection of OS. Meanwhile, the synthesized BiOI NSs with great biocompatibility is able to achieve effective radiotherapy (RT) by enhancing X-ray dose deposition at the tumor site, leading to DNA damage, which in turn inhibits tumor growth. This study offers a promising new avenue for DECT imaging-guided treatment of OS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据