4.7 Article

Chemical Expansion of Yttrium-Doped Barium Zirconate and Correlation with Proton Concentration and Conductivity

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CERAMIC SOCIETY
卷 99, 期 11, 页码 3745-3753

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/jace.14377

关键词

fuel cell; proton conductor; chemical expansion; barium zirconate

资金

  1. New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO) in Japan [P08023]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Y-doped BaZrO3 (BZY) is a promising candidate as an electrolyte in fuel cells, and attracts increasing attention. In this work, a systematic investigation was performed on microstructure, proton concentration, proton conductivity, and hydration induced chemical expansion in Y-doped BaZrO3. The results revealed that the bimodal microstructure in BaZr0.85Y0.15O3- was composed of large grains with composition close to the nominal value, and fine grains with large compositional discrepancy. This property is considered to be one of the evidences of phase separation at lower temperature than sintering temperature (1600 degrees C), which hinders the grain growth. Thermal expansion coefficient of BZY was measured for various dopant level, and was determined to be around 10(-5) K-1 in wet and dry argon atmosphere. In addition, chemical expansion effect due to hydration was confirmed by HT-XRD in dry and wet Ar atmospheres, and suggests an interesting relationship between the lattice change ratio and proton concentration, in the BZY system with different Y content. The change ratio of lattice constant due to hydration increased obviously with the proton concentration for the sample containing the Y content of 0.02 and 0.05, but only changed slightly when the Y content was increased to 0.1 and 0.15. However, when the Y content was further increased over 0.2, the change ratio of lattice constant due to hydration starts to increase obviously again. Such results indicate a high possibility that the stable sites of protons in BZY changed with the variation in Y content.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据