4.8 Article

Plasmonic Nanoparticles on Graphene Absorber for Broadband High Responsivity 2D/3D Photodiode

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 17, 期 10, 页码 9262-9271

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.3c00566

关键词

graphene; molybdenum disulfide; heterojunction; photodiode; carrier multiplication; plasmon; gold nanoparticles

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to solve the image deterioration caused by the pixel miniaturization in high-resolution CMOS image sensor technology, a photodiode with an enhanced mechanism based on a distinctive device structure is needed. This study introduced a photodiode consisting of gold nanoparticles/monolayer graphene/n-type trilayer MoS2/p-type Si bulk, which achieved ultrafast rising/falling times due to the narrow depletion width resulting from the 2D/3D heterojunction. To compensate for the expected low absorbance, plasmonic gold nanoparticles on monolayer graphene were introduced, resulting in broadband enhanced EQE.
To overcome the image deterioration caused by pixel miniaturization resulting from the high-resolution trend of CIS (CMOS image sensor) technology, a photodiode working with an enhanced mechanism based on a distinctive device structure from the existing one is considerably required. In this study, our photodiode, consisting of gold nanoparticles/ monolayer graphene/n-type trilayer MoS2/p-type Si bulk, achieved ultrafast rising/falling times of 28.6 ns/30.4 ns due to the spatially confined narrow depletion width (DW) resulting from the 2D/3D heterojunction. To compensate for the expected low absorbance due to the narrow DW, plasmonic gold nanoparticles on monolayer graphene are introduced, revealing broadband enhanced EQE of an average of 187% in the spectral range of 420-730 nm and the maximum EQE reaching 847% at 5 nW for a 520 nm wavelength. The broadband enhancement was further investigated through multiphysics simulation, and carrier multiplication in graphene was discussed for the reason for exceeding 100% EQE in our reverse biased photodiode.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据