4.2 Article

Prognostic Role of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Lung Cancer: a Meta-Analysis

期刊

CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 37, 期 4, 页码 1560-1571

出版社

Cell Physiol Biochem Press GmbH & Co
DOI: 10.1159/000438523

关键词

Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes; Lung Cancer; Prognosis; Meta-analysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [81171653]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Aims: The role of Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in the prognosis of patients with lung cancer is still controversial. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic role of TILs in lung cancer. Methods: Studies were recruited by searching PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library and assessed by further quality evaluation. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to investigate the association between TIL subsets and lung cancer patients' outcome. Results: A total of 29 articles including 8,600 patients were enrolled into the meta-analysis. Our results indicated that high level of CD8+ cells infiltration in tumor stroma (TS) or tumor nest (TN) was associated with better OS in lung cancer patients (HR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.62-0.93, P = 0.006; HR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.67-0.96; P = 0.018, respectively). Similar results could be also observed in CD3(+) T cells infiltration. High CD4(+) T lymphocytes infiltration in TS was explicitly accompanied by better OS (HR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.46-0.91; P = 0.013), rather than in TN. In contrast, high density of FOXP3(+) T cells infiltration in TS showed a poor PFS (HR = 2.67, 95% CI, 1.74-4.08, P < 0.001). Conclusion: This meta-analysis clarified that high level of CD8(+) and CD3(+) T cells infiltration in TS or TN, and high CD4(+) T lymphocytes infiltration in TS showed better OS in lung cancer patients, whereas high density of FOXP3(+) T cells infiltration in TS could be recognized as a negative prognostic factor. Copyright (C) 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据