4.8 Article

Fluoride-Based Stable Quasi-Solid-State Zinc Metal Battery with Superior Rate Capability

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 15, 期 12, 页码 15574-15584

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.3c00747

关键词

aqueous zinc metal batteries; quasi-solid-state; separator-free; zinc anode; superior rate capability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a LaF3-coated Zn anode (LF@Zn) is used to induce uniform and dendrite-free Zn deposition, enabling the construction of a separator-free quasi-solid-state zinc metal battery. The quasi-solid-state electrolyte based on LaF3 regulates the Zn2+ flux and suppresses corrosion side reactions. The LF@Zn anode shows a significantly prolonged lifespan and superior rate performance, making it a promising candidate for high-performance zinc metal batteries.
Aqueous zinc metal batteries are limited in practical applications due to their short lifespans. Herein, a LaF3-coated Zn anode (LF@Zn) is investigated to induce the uniform Zn deposition and successfully build a separator-free quasi-solid-state zinc metal battery. The LF@Zn enables smooth and dendrite-free Zn deposition, owing to the homogeneous Zn2+ flux regulated by the LaF3-based quasi-solid-state electrolyte. It can also suppress the corrosion side reactions by modulating the [Zn(H2O)6]2+ solvation sheath. The polarization of plating and stripping is relatively modest due to the reduced diffuse energy of desolvated Zn2+ in the quasi-solid-state electrolyte. In a separator-free symmetric cell, the LF@Zn anode shows a significantly prolonged lifespan of over 1300 h at 2 mA cm-2 and a superior rate performance with only 156 mV at an ultrahigh current density of 50 mA cm-2. A LF@Zn// VO2 quasi-solid-state full cell exhibits outperforming rate capability and a long cyclic performance for up to 3000 cycles at 6.0 A g-1. A stable Zn anode is established in this work with a fluoride-based quasi-solid-state electrolyte, opening up a new avenue for protecting metal anodes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据