4.8 Article

Metal-Decorated InN Monolayer Senses N2 against CO2

期刊

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.2c21463

关键词

InN monolayer; N2 sensing; electrical response; transition metal decorated; density functional theory

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Poor selectivity is a common issue for gas sensors, especially when dealing with binary mixture gases. This study investigates the selective adsorption mechanism of a transition metal-decorated InN monolayer using density functional theory. The results show that Ni decoration enhances the conductivity of the InN monolayer and exhibits unexpected affinity for N2 over CO2. The study provides new insights and opportunities for the development of N2-sensitive materials with high selectivity.
Poor selectivity is a common problem faced by gas sensors. In particular, the contribution of each gas cannot be reasonably distributed when a binary mixture gas is co-adsorbed. In this paper, taking CO2 and N2 as an example, density functional theory is used to reveal the mechanism of selective adsorption of a transition metal (Fe, Co, Ni, and Cu)-decorated InN monolayer. The results show that Ni decoration can improve the conductivity of the InN monolayer while at the same time demonstrating an unexpected affinity for binding N2 instead of CO2. Compared with the pristine InN monolayer, the adsorption energies of N2 and CO2 on the Ni-decorated InN are dramatically increased from -0.1 to -1.93 eV and from -0.2 to -0.66 eV, respectively. Interestingly, for the first time, the density of states demonstrates that the Ni-decorated InN monolayer achieves a single electrical response to N2, eliminating the interference of CO2. Furthermore, the d-band center theory explains the advantage of Ni decorated in gas adsorption over Fe, Co, and Cu atoms. We also highlight the necessity of thermodynamic calculations in evaluating practical applications. Our theoretical results provide new insights and opportunities for exploring N2-sensitive materials with high selectivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据