4.8 Article

Nanoporous Conducting Polymer Nanowire Network-Encapsulated MnO2-Based Flexible Supercapacitor with Enhanced Rate Capability and Cycling Stability

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 15, 期 18, 页码 22563-22573

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.3c03028

关键词

PEDOT nanowire; conducting encapsulation; manganese dioxide; rate capability; cycling stability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We address the poor electron and ion transport in transition-metal-oxide-based electrochemical electrodes by developing a conducting encapsulation strategy. The performance of the composite electrode is substantially enhanced, improving the rate capability, capacitance retention, and specific capacitance.
Transition-metal-oxide-based electrochemical electrodes usually suffer from poor electron and ion transport, leading to deteriorated rate performance and cycling stability. Herein, we address these issues by developing a facile conducting encapsulation strategy toward a nanoporous PEDOT nanowire/MnO2 nanoparticle/PEDOT nanowire composite electrode. Through encapsulation of the PEDOT nanowire network, the overall electrochemical performance of the resultant composite electrode is substantially enhanced. Specifically, the rate capability and capacitance retention are improved by similar to 48.2 and similar to 33%, respectively, which are 89.8% at 0.8-40 mA/cm2 and 93% after 3000 charge/discharge cycles at 2.0 mA/cm2, respectively. Moreover, the specific capacitance is increased by similar to 6 times of that of the MnO2@PEDOT NW electrode at similar to 200 mA/cm2. We find that a nanoporous conducting nanowire network that encapsulates a MnO2 nanoparticle layer can provide efficient electron and ion transport paths and stabilize the structure of MnO2 from collapse during charge/discharge cycling and mechanical deformation. This strategy can be applied to other pseudocapacitive material-based electrochemical electrodes, such as transition-metal oxides and conducting polymers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据