4.8 Article

Toward Perfect Surfaces of Transition Metal Dichalcogenides with Ion Bombardment and Annealing Treatment

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 15, 期 12, 页码 16153-16161

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.2c21150

关键词

2D materials; defects; ion bombardment; scanning tunneling microscopy; reflection high-energy electron diffraction; synchrotron-based photoelectron spectroscopy; density functional theory

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Layered transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) are two-dimensional materials with great potential in electronic and optoelectronic applications, but surface defects significantly affect their performance. We propose a counterintuitive two-step process involving Ar ion bombardment and subsequent annealing to decrease surface defects on TMDs. With this approach, the defect density on PtTe2 and PdTe2 surfaces was reduced by more than 99%, mainly Te vacancies, achieving a defect density <1.0 x 10^10 cm-2, which cannot be achieved solely with annealing. We also attempt to propose a mechanism behind these processes.
Layered transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) are two-dimensional materials exhibiting a variety of unique features with great potential for electronic and optoelectronic applications. The performance of devices fabricated with mono or few-layer TMD materials, nevertheless, is significantly affected by surface defects in the TMD materials. Recent efforts have been focused on delicate control of growth conditions to reduce the defect density, whereas the preparation of a defect-free surface remains challenging. Here, we show a counterintuitive approach to decrease surface defects on layered TMDs: a two-step process including Ar ion bombardment and subsequent annealing. With this approach, the defects, mainly Te vacancies, on the as-cleaved PtTe2 and PdTe2 surfaces were decreased by more than 99%, giving a defect density <1.0 x 1010 cm-2, which cannot be achieved solely with annealing. We also attempt to propose a mechanism behind the processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据