4.8 Article

High-Performance Solar-Blind UV Phototransistors Based on ZnO/Ga2O3 Heterojunction Channels

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 15, 期 14, 页码 18372-18378

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.2c21314

关键词

ZnO; solar-blind photodetector; UV phototransistors; thin-film transistors; high spectral selectivity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High-performance solar-blind (200-280 nm) ultraviolet (UV) photodetectors based on a low-cost thin-film ZnO/Ga2O3 heterojunction are constructed. The optimized photodetector shows high spectral selectivity, a high photo-to-dark current ratio, and fast response speed under 254 nm UV light. The use of a gate electrode in the three-terminal phototransistor amplifies responsivity and increases the photo-to-dark current ratio, while the built-in electric field at the ZnO/Ga2O3 heterojunction controls electron distribution and enhances device performance.
High-performance phototransistor-based solar-blind (200-280 nm) ultraviolet (UV) photodetectors (PDs) are constructed with a low-cost thin-film ZnO/Ga2O3 heterojunction. The optimized PD shows high spectral selectivity (R254/R365 > 1 x 103) with a photo-to-dark current ratio of similar to 104, a responsivity of 113 mA/W, a detectivity of 1.25 x 1012 Jones, and a response speed of 41 ms under 254 nm UV light irradiation. It is found that the gate electrode of a three-terminal phototransistor can amplify the responsivity and increase the photo-to-dark current ratio because of the different densities of field-induced electrons at different gate biases. In addition, the built-in electric field at the ZnO/Ga2O3 heterojunction interface can control the distribution of the photoinduced electrons and the total conductivity of the heterojunction, which can further enhance device performance. Together with the simple fabrication process, the achieved results suggest that the three-terminal ZnO/Ga2O3 heterojunction phototransistor is a promising candidate for highly sensitive solar-blind PDs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据