4.7 Review

Interpreting Adversarial Examples in Deep Learning: A Review

期刊

ACM COMPUTING SURVEYS
卷 55, 期 14S, 页码 -

出版社

ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY
DOI: 10.1145/3594869

关键词

Deep learning; adversarial example; interpretability; adversarial robustness

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article presents a framework that discusses recent works on theoretically explaining adversarial examples from three perspectives, instead of reviewing technical progress in adversarial attacks and defenses. Drawing on reviewed literature, this survey identifies current problems and challenges and highlights potential future research directions in investigating adversarial examples.
Deep learning technology is increasingly being applied in safety-critical scenarios but has recently been found to be susceptible to imperceptible adversarial perturbations. This raises a serious concern regarding the adversarial robustness of deep neural network (DNN)-based applications. Accordingly, various adversarial attacks and defense approaches have been proposed. However, current studies implement different types of attacks and defenses with certain assumptions. There is still a lack of full theoretical understanding and interpretation of adversarial examples. Instead of reviewing technical progress in adversarial attacks and defenses, this article presents a framework consisting of three perspectives to discuss recent works focusing on theoretically explaining adversarial examples comprehensively. In each perspective, various hypotheses are further categorized and summarized into several subcategories and introduced systematically. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to concentrate on surveying existing research on adversarial examples and adversarial robustness from the interpretability perspective. By drawing on the reviewed literature, this survey characterizes current problems and challenges that need to be addressed and highlights potential future research directions to further investigate adversarial examples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据