4.6 Article

A retrospective, multicenter analysis of the predictive value of mitotic rate for sentinel lymph node (SLN) positivity in thin melanomas

期刊

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.09.014

关键词

breslow thickness; cutaneous neoplasm; lymphadenectomy; melanoma; mitotic figure; mitotic index; mitotic rate; prognosis; sentinel lymph node biopsy; sentinel node; staging; thin melanoma; tumors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: There is a paucity of studies to substantiate whether the presence of a single mitosis justifies sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy (SLNB) in thin melanomas. Objective: We sought to determine if mitotic rate is associated with SLNB outcome when taking into account other prognostic factors. Methods: All cases of melanoma that underwent SLNB in the province of Alberta, Canada, between 2007 and 2013 were reviewed through a provincial tumor database. Results: A total of 1072 patients fulfilled inclusion criteria. When analyzing all melanomas regardless of thickness, mitotic rate was a good predictor of SLN status. When stratified by Breslow thickness, only intermediate melanomas (1.01-2.0 mm) demonstrated a significant relationship between mitotic rate and positive SLN status (P = .010). For melanomas 1 mm or smaller, mitotic rate was not associated with SLN status. A statistically significant interaction was identified between Breslow thickness and mitotic rate such that for decreasing Breslow depth, the effect of mitotic rate on SLNB status diminished (P = .028). Limitations: The study was retrospective in nature. There is underlying variability in mitotic rate reporting methods over time, and between different dermatopathologists. Conclusions: Mitotic rate does not have unequivocal utility in predicting SLNB status in thin melanomas. There is a significant interaction between mitotic rate and Breslow depth, such that the predictive value of mitotic rate on SLN positivity may be dependent on Breslow thickness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据