3.8 Article

Individual and Work-Related Characteristics Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination Status among Ohio Nurses

期刊

POLICY POLITICS & NURSING PRACTICE
卷 24, 期 2, 页码 81-90

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/15271544221141060

关键词

COVID-19; vaccine; nurses

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the COVID-19 vaccine uptake among nurses was found to be low. Factors such as older age, higher education levels, and working in critical care were associated with higher vaccination rates. Additionally, providing direct care for COVID-19 patients and perceiving a higher impact of COVID-19 on one's work were positively associated with vaccination, while prior COVID-19 infection was negatively associated with vaccination status.
Uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine by nurses lags behind that of other health care professionals with minimal empirical evidence to understand this phenomenon. In this secondary analysis, we examined nurses' individual and work-related characteristics and their association with COVID-19 vaccination status. Alumni of three Ohio nursing colleges and members of a professional organization were invited to complete questionnaires from June through August 2021. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate associations between nurse characteristics and vaccination status. Among 844 respondents, 754 (80.30%) had received at least one dose of the vaccine. Older age, having a bachelor's degree or higher, and working in critical care were associated with vaccination. Providing direct care for COVID-19 patients in the last 7 days and a higher perception of one's work being affected by COVID-19 were significantly associated with being vaccinated, whereas prior COVID-19 infection was inversely associated with vaccination status. Our findings suggest that COVID-19 vaccine uptake among nurses is influenced by a host of factors related to virus knowledge, beliefs, and risk perceptions. Awareness of these factors can aid the development of interventions to increase nurses' acceptance of vaccines.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据