4.5 Article

Targeting the bicarbonate transporter SLC4A4 overcomes immunosuppression and immunotherapy resistance in pancreatic cancer

期刊

NATURE CANCER
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s43018-022-00470-2

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. ERC Consolidator grant [773208]
  2. ERC Proof of Concept (BasicFit) [101069459]
  3. European Union [766214]
  4. AIRC [IG2017-20258]
  5. Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio Torino CRT [2018.1311]
  6. Ricerca Sanitaria Finalizzata [RF-2016-02361048]
  7. Kom op tegen Kanker (Stand up to Cancer)
  8. Flemish Cancer Society [3320, 12679]
  9. European Research Council (ERC) [101069459, 773208] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

SLC4A4 inhibition in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) improves the acidic tumor microenvironment, enhances T cell-mediated immune response, and suppresses tumor growth and metastasis.
Solid tumors are generally characterized by an acidic tumor microenvironment (TME) that favors cancer progression, therapy resistance and immune evasion. By single-cell RNA-sequencing analysis in individuals with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), we reveal solute carrier family 4 member 4 (SLC4A4) as the most abundant bicarbonate transporter, predominantly expressed by epithelial ductal cells. Functionally, SLC4A4 inhibition in PDAC cancer cells mitigates the acidosis of the TME due to bicarbonate accumulation in the extracellular space and a decrease in lactate production by cancer cells as the result of reduced glycolysis. In PDAC-bearing mice, genetic or pharmacological SLC4A4 targeting improves T cell-mediated immune response and breaches macrophage-mediated immunosuppression, thus inhibiting tumor growth and metastases. In addition, Slc4a4 targeting in combination with immune checkpoint blockade is able to overcome immunotherapy resistance and prolong survival. Overall, our data propose SLC4A4 as a therapeutic target to unleash an antitumor immune response in PDAC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据