The Dutch see Red: (in)formal science advisory bodies during the COVID-19 pandemic

We analyse the roles, dynamics and logic of science advice in structuring the Dutch response to the COVID-19 pandemic, from January 2020 to December 2020. We address how the Dutch government responded by paying attention to styles of governance and expert advice. We argue that the Dutch response was shaped by the interplay of corporatist, deliberative and neoliberal forms of governance, in particular, how early corporatist tendencies seemed to create consensus during the first phase of the pandemic but quickly led to criticism and tension, most visibly at the onset of the second wave, as corporatist and neoliberal responses conflicted with deliberative and pluralist political engagement. Situating different science advisory bodies in this dynamic, we highlight how science-policy interactions and conflicts that evolved with the dynamics of the pandemic can be understood within this triad and as reflective broadly of the endurance of the Dutch model of polder governance.

Automated summary

This study analyzes the Dutch response to the COVID-19 pandemic from January 2020 to December 2020, focusing on the roles, dynamics, and logic of science advice. The study explores how the Dutch government responded based on styles of governance and expert advice. The findings suggest that the Dutch response was influenced by the interplay of corporatist, deliberative, and neoliberal forms of governance, resulting in consensus, criticism, and tension during the different phases of the pandemic.