In Vitro Characterization of 6-Methyl-3-(2-nitro-1-(thiophen-2yl)ethyl)-2-phenyl-1H-indole (ZCZ011) at the Type 1 Cannabinoid Receptor: Allosteric Agonist or Allosteric Modulator?

Orthosteric activation of CB1 is known to cause a plethora of adverse side effects in vivo. Allosteric modulation is an exciting therapeutic approach and is hoped to offer improved therapeutic potential and a reduced on-target side effect profile compared to orthosteric agonists. This study aimed to systematically characterize the in vitro activity of the positive allosteric modulator ZCZ011, explicitly considering its effects on receptor regulation. HEK293 cells expressing hCB(1) receptors were used to characterize ZCZ011 alone and in combination with orthosteric agonists. Real-time BRET approaches were employed for G protein dissociation, cAMP signaling, and beta-arrestin translocation. Characterization also included ERK1/2 phosphorylation (PerkinElmer AIphaLISA) and receptor internalization. ZCZ011 is an allosteric agonist of CB, in all pathways tested, with a similar signaling profile to that of the partial orthosteric agonist Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol. ZCZ011 also showed limited positive allosteric modulation in increasing the potency and efficacy of THC-induced ERK1/2 phosphorylation, P-arrestin translocation, and receptor internalization. However, no positive allosteric modulation was observed for ZCZ011 in combination with either CPSS940 or AMB-FUBINACA, in G protein dissociation, nor cAMP inhibition. Our study suggests that ZCZ011 is an allosteric agonist, with effects that are often difficult to differentiate from those of orthosteric agonists. Together with its pronounced agonist activity, the limited extent of ZCZ011 positive allosteric modulation suggests that further investigation into the differences between allosteric and orthosteric agonism is required, especially in receptor regulation end points.

Automated summary

This study systematically characterized the in vitro activity of the positive allosteric modulator ZCZ011 and found that it had similar signaling profiles to orthosteric agonists. However, its positive allosteric modulation was limited compared to THC-induced effects. Further investigation into the differences between allosteric and orthosteric agonism is required.