4.1 Article

The association of blood ctDNA levels to mutations of marker genes in colorectal cancer

期刊

CANCER REPORTS
卷 6, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.1782

关键词

association study; cell-free circulating tumor DNAs (ctDNA); colorectal cancer (CRC); genomic variations; random forest

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined the association between mutations of genes identified in ctDNAs and ctDNA concentration in the blood of CRC patients. The results showed that mutations in five genes were associated with ctDNA concentrations. By analyzing ctDNA mutations, we can infer tumor burden or size and predict survival time.
BackgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) is a deadly and commonly diagnosed cancer. Cell-free circulating tumor DNAs (ctDNA) have been used in the diagnosis and treatment of CRC, but there are open questions about the relationship between ctDNAs and CRC. Although mutations of genes detected by ctDNA in CRC have been studied, the quantitative relationship between ctDNA mutations and ctDNA concentration has not been addressed. AimsWe hypothesized that there was an association between mutations of genes identified in ctDNAs and ctDNA concentration. His study examined this association in a population of CRC patients. MethodsIn 85 CRC patients, we sampled 282 mutations in 36 genes and conducted an association study based on a Random forest model between mutations and ctDNA concentrations in all patients. ResultsThis association study showed that mutations on five genes, ALK, PMS2, KDR, MAP2K1, and MSH2, were associated with the ctDNA concentrations in CRC patients' blood samples. Because ctDNA mutations correlate with ctDNA level, we can infer the tumor burden or tumor size from ctDNA mutations, as well as the survival time for prognosis. ConclusionOur findings shed light on the associations between mutations of genes identified in ctDNAs and ctDNA concentration in the blood of CRC patients. This discovery provides information regarding the tumor burden or tumor size based on ctDNA mutations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据