4.0 Article

Execution Time Decrease for Controllers Based on Adaptive Particle Swarm Optimization

期刊

INVENTIONS
卷 8, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/inventions8010009

关键词

optimal control; receding horizon control; particle swarm optimization; control profile; simulation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Execution time is crucial in control structures using metaheuristic-based optimization algorithms. This paper investigates decreasing execution time in the context of Receding Horizon Control, where a metaheuristic algorithm is used for prediction. The concept of adapting the control variables' domains for each sampling period is introduced, along with tuning the domains to maintain convergence. Simulation results demonstrate the practical relevance and significant reduction in execution time achieved using the proposed techniques.
Execution time is an important topic when using metaheuristic-based optimization algorithms within control structures. This is the case with Receding Horizon Control, whose controller makes predictions based on a metaheuristic algorithm. Because the closed loop's main time constraint is that the controller's run time must be smaller than the sampling period, this paper joins the authors' previous work in investigating decreasing execution time. In this context, good results have been obtained by introducing the reference control profile concept that leads to the idea of adapting the control variables' domains for each sampling period. This paper continues to address this concept, which is adjusted to harmonize with the Particle Swarm Optimization algorithm. Moreover, besides adapting the control variables' domains, the proposed controller's algorithm tunes these domains to avoid losing convergence. A simulation study validates the new techniques using a nontrivial process model and considering three modes in which the controller works. The results showed that the proposed techniques have practical relevance and significantly decrease execution time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据