4.2 Article

Improved prediction accuracy of biomass heating value using proximate analysis with various ANN training algorithms

期刊

RESULTS IN ENGINEERING
卷 16, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100688

关键词

Biomass; Higher heating value; Artificial neural network; ANN; Levenberg-marquardt; Training algorithm

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The conventional experimental methods for determining biomass heating value are laborious and costly. This study develops an ANN model trained with 11 different algorithms to predict the HHV of biomass samples. The results show that the ANN trained with Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm achieves the highest accuracy.
The conventional experimental methods to determine biomass heating value are laborious and costly. Numerous correlations to estimate biomass' higher heating values have been proposed using proximate analysis. Recently, the utilisation of artificial neural network (ANN) has been extensively applied to predict HHV. However, most studies of ANN to estimate the biomass' HHV only use one algorithm to train a small number of biomass datasets. The specific objective of this study is to predict the HHV of 350 samples of biomass from the proximate analysis by developing an ANN model which was trained with 11 different algorithms. This study fills a gap in the research on how to predict the HHV of biomass using numerous ANN training algorithms utilising sizeable biomass datasets. Results show that the ANN trained with Levenberg-Marquardt gave the highest accuracy. The Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm shows the best fit giving the highest R and R-2 values and the lowest MAD, MSE, RMSE and MAPE. Compared with previous biomass HHV prediction studies, the ANN model developed in this study provides improved prediction accuracy with higher R2 and lower RMSE. Results from this study have also indicated that the Levenberg-Marquardt should be the first-choice supervised algorithm for feedforward-backpropagation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据