4.4 Article

The Influence of Image Realism of Digital Endorsers on the Purchase Intention of Gift Products for the Elderly

期刊

BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/bs13010074

关键词

elderly product; digital endorser; advertising; perceived social value; framing effect

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Digital endorsers are widely used in various industries. This study aimed to examine the impact of image realism of digital endorsers on the purchase intention of gift products for the elderly. Three online experiments were conducted. Study 1 found that cartoon digital endorsers generated higher purchase intention compared to realistic digital endorsers. Study 2 revealed that perceived social value mediated the relationship between image realism of digital endorsers and purchase intention. Study 3 demonstrated the moderating role of information framing. Overall, this research contributes to the literature on digital human endorsements and advertising of elderly products and provides managerial implications for marketers and consumers.
Digital endorsers are already utilized extensively in various businesses. The major objective of the current study was to find out the impact of image realism of digital endorsers on the purchase intention of gift products for the elderly. We investigated this issue through three online experiments. Study 1 (n = 205) found that cartoon digital endorsers (vs. realistic digital endorsers) generate higher purchase intention for the product. Study 2 (n = 175) showed that perceived social value plays a mediating role in the relationship between the image realism of digital endorsers and purchase intention. Study 3 (n = 127) demonstrated the moderating role of information framing in the relationship between the image realism of digital endorsers and purchase intention. In all, our research extends the previous literature on digital human endorsements and advertising of elderly products and provides several managerial implications for consumers and marketers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据