4.2 Article

Risk of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) with lamotrigine and other sodium channel-modulating antiseizure medications

期刊

EPILEPSIA OPEN
卷 8, 期 2, 页码 334-345

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/epi4.12693

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to investigate the association between lamotrigine and sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP). The retrospective, nested case-control study included 101 SUDEP cases and 199 living epilepsy controls from Australia and the USA. The results showed no increased risk of SUDEP associated with the use of lamotrigine or other sodium channel modulating anti-seizure medications.
ObjectiveIn vitro data prompted U.S Food and Drug Administration warnings that lamotrigine, a common sodium channel modulating anti-seizure medication (NaM-ASM), could increase the risk of sudden death in patients with structural or ischaemic cardiac disease, however, its implications for Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) are unclear. MethodsThis retrospective, nested case-control study identified 101 sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) cases and 199 living epilepsy controls from Epilepsy Monitoring Units (EMUs) in Australia and the USA. Differences in proportions of lamotrigine and NaM-ASM use were compared between cases and controls at the time of admission, and survival analyses from the time of admission up to 16 years were conducted. Multivariable logistic regression and survival analyses compared each ASM subgroup adjusting for SUDEP risk factors. ResultsProportions of cases and controls prescribed lamotrigine (P = 0.166), one NaM-ASM (P = 0.80), or >= 2NaM-ASMs (P = 0.447) at EMU admission were not significantly different. Patients taking lamotrigine (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.56; P = 0.054), one NaM-ASM (aHR = 0.8; P = 0.588) or >= 2 NaM-ASMs (aHR = 0.49; P = 0.139) at EMU admission were not at increased SUDEP risk up to 16 years following admission. Active tonic-clonic seizures at EMU admission associated with >2-fold SUDEP risk, irrespective of lamotrigine (aHR = 2.24; P = 0.031) or NaM-ASM use (aHR = 2.25; P = 0.029). Sensitivity analyses accounting for incomplete ASM data at follow-up suggest undetected changes to ASM use are unlikely to alter our results. SignificanceThis study provides additional evidence that lamotrigine and other NaM-ASMs are unlikely to be associated with an increased long-term risk of SUDEP, up to 16 years post-EMU admission.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据