4.4 Article

In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation of a Nano-Tool Appended Oilmix (Clove and Tea Tree Oil) Thermosensitive Gel for Vaginal Candidiasis

期刊

JOURNAL OF FUNCTIONAL BIOMATERIALS
卷 13, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jfb13040203

关键词

nanoemulsion; pseudo-ternary phase diagram; ex vivo permeation study; MTT assay; mucoadhesion

资金

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research at Najran University, Najran, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia under the Research Groups funding program [NU/ RG/MRC/11/2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aimed to develop a thermosensitive gel for the treatment of vaginal candidiasis by combining clove and tea tree oil. The gel exhibited broad antimicrobial and analgesic properties. In vitro and in vivo experiments confirmed the potential of the gel for recurrent candidiasis and other infections.
The main objective of the proposed work was the development of a thermosensitive gel (containing clove and tea tree oil) for the management of vaginal candidiasis. Both oils have been recommended to be used separately in a topical formulation for vaginal candidiasis. Incorporating two natural ingredients (clove and tea tree oil) into a product give it a broad antimicrobial spectrum and analgesic properties. The two oils were mixed together at a 3:1 ratio and converted into o/w nanoemulsion using the aqueous titration method and plotting pseudo ternary phase diagrams. Further transformations resulted in a gel with thermosensitive properties. To determine the final formulation's potential for further clinical investigation, in vitro analyses (viscosity measurement, MTT assay, mucoadhesion, ex vivo permeation) and in vivo studies (fungal clearance kinetics in an animal model) were conducted. The current effort leveraged the potential of tea tree and clove oils as formulation ingredients and natural therapeutic agents for vaginal infections. Its synergy generated a stable and effective thermosensitive gel that can be utilized for recurrent candidiasis and other infections.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据