4.5 Article

Infectious bursal disease virus uptake involves macropinocytosis and trafficking to early endosomes in a Rab5-dependent manner

期刊

CELLULAR MICROBIOLOGY
卷 17, 期 7, 页码 988-1007

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cmi.12415

关键词

-

资金

  1. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica [PICT2008-0192, PICT2011-0455]
  2. SeCTyP (Universidad Nacional de Cuyo)
  3. PIP-CONICET [11420110100237]
  4. SeCTyP-UNCuyo [06/M040]
  5. U. Maza [889/12]
  6. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [AGL2011-24758]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) internalization is sparsely known in terms of molecular components of the pathway involved. To describe the cell biological features of IBDV endocytosis, we employed perturbants of endocytic pathways such as pharmacological inhibitors and overexpression of dominant-negative mutants. Internalization analysis was performed quantifying infected cells by immunofluorescence and Western blot detection of the viral protein VP3 at 12h post-infection reinforced by the analysis of the capsid protein VP2 localization after virus uptake at 1h post-infection. We compared IBDV infection to the internalization of well-established ligands with defined endocytic pathways: transferrin, cholera-toxin subunit B and dextran. To describe virus endocytosis at the morphological level, we performed ultrastructural studies of viral internalization kinetics in control and actin dynamics-blocked cells. Our results indicate that IBDV endocytic internalization was clathrin- and dynamin-independent, and that IBDV uses macropinocytosis as the primary entry mechanism. After uptake, virus traffics to early endosomes and requires exposure to the low endocytic pH as well as a functional endocytic pathway to complete its replication cycle. Moreover, our results indicate that the GTPase Rab5 is crucial for IBDV entry supporting the participation of the early endosomal pathway in IBDV internalization and infection of susceptible cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据