4.3 Review

Pleural effusion due to nonmalignant gastrointestinal disease

期刊

ERJ OPEN RESEARCH
卷 9, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY SOC JOURNALS LTD
DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00290-2022

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although pleural effusion is common in clinical practice, it can be challenging to determine its cause, with up to 20% of cases remaining undiagnosed. Nonmalignant gastrointestinal diseases can be a source of pleural effusion, which can be confirmed through patient history, physical examination, and abdominal ultrasonography. Accurate interpretation of pleural fluid from thoracentesis is crucial in this process. The diagnosis and appropriate treatment of this condition depend on the specialist's evaluation of the pleural fluid appearance and relevant tests.
Although pleural effusion is a frequent finding in clinical practice, determining its aetiology may be challenging, and up to 20% of cases remain undiagnosed. Pleural effusion may occur secondary to a nonmalignant gastrointestinal disease. A gastrointestinal origin is confirmed based on a review of the medical history of the patient, thorough physical examination and abdominal ultrasonography. In this process, it is crucial to correctly interpret findings on pleural fluid obtained by thoracentesis. In the absence of high clinical suspicion, identifying the aetiology of this type of effusion may be difficult. Clinical symptoms will be determined by the gastrointestinal process causing pleural effusion. In this setting, correct diagnosis relies on the specialist's ability to evaluate pleural fluid appearance, test for the appropriate biochemical parameters and determine whether it is necessary or not to send a specimen for culture. The established diagnosis will determine how pleural effusion is approached. Although this clinical condition is self-limited, many cases will require a multidisciplinary approach because some effusions can only be resolved with specific therapies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据