3.8 Article

Diffusive separation in rarefied plume interaction

期刊

出版社

A V S AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1116/6.0002126

关键词

-

资金

  1. Materials innovation institute M2i [F22.3.13512]
  2. Foundation for Fundamental Research on Matter (FOM)
  3. Dutch Research Council (NWO)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes the use of a light inert carrier gas to improve deposition uniformity and rate in continuous physical vapor deposition. The effect of adding a carrier gas on interaction shocks is evaluated. The study shows that species separation caused by interaction shocks can result in nonuniform coatings, and this phenomenon intensifies with higher degrees of rarefaction.
In the present study, we propose the use of a light, inert carrier gas to support deposition uniformity and rate in continuous physical vapor deposition, in which closely spaced slots or nozzles are required to achieve a sufficiently high deposition rate. Interaction shocks between the emerging rarefied plumes cause undesired nonuniformities in the deposited coating. The present work evaluates the effect of adding a carrier gas on the interaction shock. We study the interaction between two sonic plumes consisting of a binary mixture, i.e., silver as coating material and helium as a light inert carrier gas, by direct simulation Monte Carlo. While the inlet Mach and Knudsen numbers were kept constant, the fraction of carrier gas was varied to single out the effect of species separation. The influence of rarefaction on species separation was also studied. Species separation produces a high carrier-gas fraction in the periphery and an accumulation of the heavier species in the jet core. The resulting change in the speed of sound alters the local expansion characteristics and, thus, shifts the shock location and weakens the shock. These phenomena intensify with the degree of rarefaction. It is shown that adding a light carrier gas increases deposition rate may enhance uniformity and reduce stray deposition. Published under an exclusive license by the AVS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据