3.8 Article

An empirical relation to estimate host galaxy stellar light from AGN spectra

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnrasl/slad014

关键词

methods: data analysis; galaxies: active; methods: statistical

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents an empirical relation to estimate host galaxy stellar luminosity from the optical spectra of AGNs at low redshifts (z<=0.8) using data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS-DR14). The results show an anticorrelation between the host galaxy fraction and the AGN continuum luminosity, iron strength, Eddington ratio, and redshift. The empirical relation provides comparable results to the image decomposition method for estimating the host fraction.
Measurement of black hole mass for low-z (z <= 0.8) Active Galactic Nuclei (AGNs) is difficult due to the strong contribution from host galaxy stellar light necessitating detailed spectral decomposition to estimate the AGN luminosity. Here, we present an empirical relation to estimate host galaxy stellar luminosity from the optical spectra of AGNs at z <= 0.8. The spectral data were selected from the fourteenth data release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS-DR14) quasar catalogue having a signal-to-noise ratio at 5100 angstrom (SNR5100) >10 containing 11415 quasars. The median total luminosity (log (L-total/[ergs(-1)])), stellar luminosity (log (L-star/[ergs(-1)])), and AGN continuum luminosity ((log L-cont/[ergs(-1)])) in our sample are 44.52, 44.06, and 44.30, respectively. We fit the AGN power-law continuum, host galaxy, and iron blend contribution, simultaneously over the entire available spectrum. We found the host galaxy fraction to anticorrelate with continuum luminosity and can be well-represented by a polynomial function, which can be used to correct the stellar light contribution from AGN spectra. We also found anticorrelation between host galaxy fraction and iron strength, Eddington ratio, and redshift. The empirical relation gives comparable results of host-fraction with the image decomposition method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据