3.8 Article

Simultaneous repair of bilateral temporal bone meningoencephaloceles by combined mastoid-middle cranial fossa approach

期刊

ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA CASE REPORTS
卷 8, 期 1, 页码 7-12

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/23772484.2022.2162905

关键词

Meningoencephalocele; otogenic meningitis; skull base reconstruction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Meningoencephalocele (MEC) is a rare clinical condition where the dura mater and brain tissue herniate through skull base defects. In this report, we present a case of bilateral MECs discovered after recurrent bacterial meningitis. The patient underwent simultaneous bilateral resection and repair using a combined mastoid-middle cranial fossa approach, with reconstruction of bone and dura using free bone grafts and a temporalis fascia flap. Three years after surgery, the reconstructed tegmen was well preserved and there was no recurrence of meningitis or MECs. The combined mastoid-middle cranial fossa approach appears to be a promising option for treating bilateral multiple MECs.
Meningoencephalocele (MEC) is a rare clinical entity caused by herniation of the dura mater and brain tissue through bony defects in the skull base. We herein report a case of bilateral MECs found after recurrent bacterial meningitis. The patient subsequently underwent simultaneous bilateral resection of the MECs and repair of the lateral skull base using a combined mastoid-middle cranial fossa approach. The bone and dura were reconstructed using free bone grafts and a temporalis fascia flap. Three years after surgery, temporal bone computed tomography showed that the reconstructed tegmen was preserved bilaterally, and there was no recurrence of meningitis or MECs. The appropriate surgical approach should be chosen based on the localization and size of the herniated tissue, and the presence of active infection or other coexisting pathology. Simultaneous bilateral resection using the combined mastoid-middle cranial fossa approach is a promising option for the treatment of bilateral multiple MECs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据