3.8 Article

Les universitats espanyoles i la ciencia oberta: un estudi sobre barreres i elements afavoridors

出版社

UNIV BARCELONA, SERVEI PUBLICACIONS
DOI: 10.1344/BiD2022.49.17

关键词

Science and research management; Universities; Spain; Surveys; Free access; Scientific evaluation; Research and Development policy; Scientific research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Open Science (OC) is a new model of science that emphasizes collaboration, transparency, and openness in research, involving aspects such as open access, open data, and new evaluation models. A survey of research vice-chancellors from 76 Spanish universities found that the majority of responsibilities for open science lie with the Vice-Rectorate for Research, and most universities have repositories available. Facilitating factors include coordination between vice-rectorates and library services, as well as institutional conviction for change.
Open Science (OC) constitutes a new model of science based on collaborative work between academics, on the openness and transparency of all phases of research grouping a set of elements among open access, open data, new metrics and evaluation models. Goal: know the facilitating factors and the barriers that condition the implementation of OS in universities, especially open access, research data and the evaluation of science. Methodology: the responses of the research vice-chancellors of the 76 Spanish universities integrated into the CRUE were analysed, in a survey carried out between September and November 2021. The questionnaire, online, was made up of 53 items integrated into 13 questions. CRUE sent out the questionnaire. Results: with a response rate of 36.8 %; for the most part, the competences of the OS required the Vice-Rectorate for Research. The low frequency (18 %) with which universities specify criteria for the evaluation of their commitment to CA, the availability to almost all of them of a repository, stands out. Facilitating factors have been considered the coordination between the Vice-Rectorates and the library services and the importance given to research in the political agenda, the institutional conviction with change, among other factors. In relation to the evaluation, the vice-chancellors reject the use of the journal's impact factor, in favour of carrying out a qualitative assessment of the article, the use of citations and the consideration of the 'social impact.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据